Record Screen Or Voice first?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 10 months ago
Hello:
I have provided two links below that are official Camtasia documents.  One suggests that the screen be recorded first, and then the voice narration added afterwards.  The other suggests doing the voice recording first, and then doing the screen recording afterwards.  These are opposites.  Which is the best?
https://www.techsmith.com/tutorial-camtasia-how-to-make-a-video-tutorial.html

https://support.techsmith.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000335611-Record-Voice-Narration

Thanks in advance.
Photo of richlocus

richlocus

  • 15 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes

Posted 11 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Joe Morgan

Joe Morgan

  • 5668 Posts
  • 2938 Reply Likes
I record the screen and narration at the same time. My voice is perfectly timed to my actions by default in doing so.
If my narration needs correction, I can do that while editing the project. I export and clean up the audio in Adobe Audition before final production.
That's my workflow anyway.

Regards,Joe
Photo of Dubie

Dubie

  • 962 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Audacity does have a Parametric Equalizer filter. Its a little different than Auditions and
I don't use it much except in special situations.



Mostly I just use the Equalizer effect instead.



My main use process follows this method though I do also have a few variations
and all are set up as chains to automate the process.




:)
(Edited)
Photo of Joe Morgan

Joe Morgan

  • 5668 Posts
  • 2938 Reply Likes
Actually, I "Misswrote" if you will.

What Audacity doesn't offer is Dynamics Processing. To the best of my knowledge.

 
Photo of Dubie

Dubie

  • 962 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Audacity doesn't have Dynamics Processing by name per say but can be done by way of using the Limiter or Compressor effect.

Many often used the Leveller effect (which is now in the new Distortion Effect
but can create distortion.

If you want to reduce the dynamic range ('level' out the loudness) without creating distortion, try the Limiter effect with the "soft limit" option

There is also a plugin that works well to achieve the process
 
Chris’s Dynamic Compressor plugin for Audacity
https://theaudacitytopodcast.com/chriss-dynamic-compressor-plugin-for-audacity/

:)
(Edited)
Photo of Joe Morgan

Joe Morgan

  • 5668 Posts
  • 2938 Reply Likes
I'm no audiophile. That's why I use Techguro77's techniques. That Compressor doesn't look like the same filter as the Dynamics Processing filter to me.
It doesn't have a "Expander" setting.


  
Here's Audition .There's  2 basic settings. That's it.



Like I said in my previous post.Audacity has tools to get the job done.

I'll add this. I was simply sharing my workflow in Audition.

 I tried to use the same workflow unsuccessfully in Audacity years ago. It couldn't be done.Why,  no Dynamics Processor. I've been editing my audio through Audition's automation for so long, I forgot what filter wasn't available.

 Audition is a more robust program. You can't beat the healing brush for targeted noise removal.
I'd like to see Audacity incorporate something similar. That would be a huge addition to it's tool set.

 
Photo of Dubie

Dubie

  • 962 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
I get where you are coming from. And I am no audio expert. Far from it.

But I know Audacity as you with Auditions.

I was just filling in the gaps as far as Audacity is concerned and that it can do many of the same tweaks if you will. Just have to go a different route.

I have (as you with Auditions) used Audacity for a long time and know it.
Your posts I'm sure help many Auditions users and thats awesome. I have even gone in to Audacity to look if there is a similar way to replicate some of your methods.

I hope that some of my post can helps those using Audacity the same way.

Just to touch on your last post. Expansion is accomplished with the compressor I mentioned by setting a negative value in the compress ratio. but how would you no that?

There is also another plugin I have for that.  It's Floorfish



But all said. Fighting the same war,  just different weapons.

P.S.  A healing brush in Audacity would be sweet !!

:}
Photo of kurrykid

kurrykid, Champion

  • 756 Posts
  • 123 Reply Likes
I do the same thing Joe does. It is easy to start over at a point in the recording because it can be easily edited out later. If it is difficult to tell the edit points because the screen doesn't change much, a technique that can be used used is to clap or do something that causes the audio line to jump. It makes for a good marker.

I also export to Adobe Audition to do audio cleanup.

HTH
Photo of afrohlich

afrohlich

  • 47 Posts
  • 12 Reply Likes
I do a lot of  screencast.  I prefer to record the video in silence.  When I make a mistake, I start talking about the mistake and the correction.  It creates easy ti identify regions where I need to edit.  After the video is done, I adjust video speed and then I narrate.
When I record my face, I then record audio and video at the same time, in this way lips and audio are in sync.
Photo of Dubie

Dubie

  • 962 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
I mostly do as Joe and kurrykid also especially for off the cuff videos.

I don't think though that there one is better than the other.
It's more of what one favors for their workflow.

There is also the matter of how a project might have to come together.

You may get a audio file that needs a video for it or and video file that needs audio.
You may have scripts or storyboards to have to work from etc.

:)
Photo of richlocus

richlocus

  • 15 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
Thanks Joe, kurrykid, afrohlich, and  Dubie:

Your comments confirm what I was hoping... that whatever works for the project is what I should use.  It could be voice and video recording at the same time, or recording video first and then audio.  Sweet!!!
I don't have Adobe Audition, but I do have Adobe Soundbooth CS5 which should be good enough.  Since I wasn't born with a radio announcer's deep voice, I can add base with Soundbooth, and I'm good to go. :)

Thanks for your recommendations.

Regards
Rich Locus
Photo of Shiraz Mistry

Shiraz Mistry

  • 19 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Hi Rich,

Please do not forget about using the Open-source software that others might have used with Camtasia  9 (as I am doing now) called Audacity.  I am very new to creating videos myself and this community has been invaluable with answers to our queries.

If you are using Windows, I would highly recommend downloading the file here:

http://www.audacityteam.org/download/windows/

Good luck with your projects!
Photo of afrohlich

afrohlich

  • 47 Posts
  • 12 Reply Likes
I forgot to mention that I also use audacity.  For a free software, it is quite good.
Photo of juwex

juwex

  • 22 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
I actually do the opposite - I write a script first, record the audio, and then record the screen to synchronize with the audio. It probably depends on the type of video that you are making, which method works best for you.
Photo of d.brunner

d.brunner, Employee

  • 29 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
Hi richlocus,
Just to clarify, the support article linked in your original post simply explains how the voice recording functionality works in Camtasia. It doesn't make the recommendation to record narration after the video. The tutorial video you linked to has the correct recommendation: https://www.techsmith.com/tutorial-camtasia-how-to-make-a-video-tutorial.html 

To answer your question though, the best option is the one that works for you. From our perspective, recording audio before video results in a higher quality video in the end. We spend a lot of time planning and scripting to try and minimize the video recording process, as this often the most expensive part of the process for us. That said, you can find some pretty compelling arguments that say the opposite. In the end, it's best to try a variety of different styles and stick with what works best for you.

Thanks,
Doug
(Edited)
Photo of richlocus

richlocus

  • 15 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
Doug:  You and your two teammates did such an awesome job in your tutorial.  Thanks for the advice.  Perhaps you should also consider a career in radio announcing :)